Are Computers Compromising Education?

Language Analysis are Computers Compromising Education? In the garner Are Computers Compromising Education? , A. Jones, the leading of Hightower College, explains his reasons for banning the drop of calculating machines in schoolrooms, making known parents of the many issues that it would have imposed on students.Jones addresses the issue in a in truth reasoned but concerned tone, which gradually becomes more assertive as he attempts to completely move parents to turn back with his contention, that Australias computer-based education revolution represents a moody promise to the Australian public, as it inflicts a variety of health hazards on students and is preventing them from scholarship the demand amicable and reason skills that they sine qua non to flourish in the liberal world.With a formal and cautiously structured, yet at magazines instead emotive style of writing, Jones assembleively uses a variety of persuasive words techniques to give up the rationalit y of his decision, and to accomplish it clear to parents that the forbids of having laptops in classrooms far outweigh the potential benefits.Jones appeals to the contributors common sense by and through with(predicate) the use of seemingly logical statements, which make it seem as though his head word of vox populi is the hardly reasonable one, and that it should be obvious that students should not be allowed laptops in class due to the obviously rheumy make it has on not only their education, but their social lives as well.Also, in case his position as star topology doesnt give him enough credibility amongst the parents of his college, Jones appeals to the authority of Todd Oppenheimer, a leading social theorist in the US, who states that a computer-centred classroom means overpowerplaying the immensity of conversation, of careful listening, and of expressing oneself in person.This use of reliable render works with reason and logic to convince parents that Jones arg uments are accurate and sensible, and that students brains are bonny deadened as they are lamentably being lost in straightaways technological age, which is acerbic vital qualities in them and fostering negative traits. The image which was sent along with the letter to parents, shows a group of students being ply by traditional texts and being back up with their work by a instructor.It high glitters the importance of teacher to student learning and the essential social skills that kids can acquire through constant human interaction and coach communication, as opposed to computer-based learning and crying(a) messaging. This image helps to go the principals arguments, be cause after parents recognise the necessity of teacher to student learning from the image, hearing that the lumber of teachers declines with every dollar spent on the purchase and maintenance of a computer causes them to feel morally obliged to agree with Jones in the fear that they would otherwise be comp romising their childrens education.The image excessively combines with Jones use of hyperbole and emotive address when he states that by short-changing our teachers, we rob our children of a future to give the cumulative forcefulness of both evoking an emotional response from parents in front their basic reason and logic comes into play, and take aback them into accepting his point of view that the veritable world is inhabited by people, not machines, and our classrooms should reflect this reality by ditching the melodic theme of having laptops in classrooms, and encouraging more interaction among students and teachers in order to prepare our kids for the future.In addition to the array of emotional appeals and hyperbolic statements the writer applies throughout the letter, Jones appeals to the parents hip-pocket nerve by bringing to light the fact that the cost of down time where the computer is being repaired far exceeds the sign purchase cost of the unit. Since bills is one of the main driving forces in everyones lives, this use of persuasive linguistic communication effectively influences parents to approve of the principals decision totally through their desire to be financially secure.Jones eliminates any reason for parents to oppose his views through appeals to their sense of fear and their morals and values, by referring to this issue as a sorry phenomenon and claiming that the constant use of computers has a ruinous effect on childrens learning abilities and could have other damaging effects on the brain.The negative connotations in words like detrimental and disturbing add to his alarming tone in order to arouse fear and misgiving in parents by suggesting that if they push for laptops to be made available in classrooms, they would be doing a great deal of distress to their own children. This compels the parents of students at Hightower College to share in the principals point of view that the school should not be inclined(p) to c ompromise the learning abilities of students in support of a fad.Throughout his letter, Jones relies on his concerned, yet assertive tone and use of reason and logic, to really sway the parents of Hightower College to reckon that his decision to ban the use of computers in classrooms is obviously the right thing to do. The inclusion of evidence from an authoritative position, even higher(prenominal) than his position of principal, adds extra legitimacy to his arguments by presenting parents with a credible point of view.Jones similarly constantly plays with the parents emotions and morals while appealing to their sense of fear, because as parents they would never want to compromise their childrens ability to learn or cause any damaging effects to the brains of their kids. Jones occupation of a variety of persuasive language techniques allows him to effectively convey his arguments, and the cumulative effect that they give helps to convince parents of his point of view, that we n eed to resist the temptation to dumb down the classroom, and reinstate a more trusty and human environment for our children.